I found good site and bad sites related to child labor.
http://www.eclt.org/
→this site places enphasis on the idea to eliminate the tabacco environment from the work place where child labors work.
http://www.unicef.org/protection/57929_58009.html
→this site is one of the UNICEF sites which is trying to eliminate child labors.
http://www.thewritefuture.com/the-write-future/child-labour/
→criticizing the child labor and slave
http://shurhold.com/article/blog/support-usa-child-labor/
→this is refering to child labor but not refering to the core problem of this issue so I don't think it is not a good site.
2013年6月28日金曜日
Web sites
this is an example of a good websites about child labor, and its reason.
site: International Lobor Organization
http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm
the ILO has 900 work in technical cooperation programmes and projects. the ILO is a specialized agency of United Nations, and the director is Guy Ryder. Guy Ryder studied Social and Political Sciences at the University of Cambridge and Latin American Studies at the University of Liverpool. He started his professional career in 1981 as assistant at the International Department of the Trade Union Congress in London. in other field, he was elected as first General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC).
this site is sponsoring author's page. ILO is devoted to promoting social justice and internationally recognized human and labour rights, pursuing its founding mission that labour peace is essential to prosperity. if we contact to this organization, we should send them an e-mail at info@ilo.org
the ILO present over-simplified perspective on child labor, and appeal reasonably with no extreme or exaggerated languages.
many links to other websites are found, and these links work normally and support author's claim.
the date of publication can be found, and the latest topic was added on 13 June 2013. it shows that it is a reliable information.
facts on this page is correct because author conclude from much information and data from official examination. there are no spelling error, and we can verified that the information is true from the URL of the reference.
also, opinions on the web page is supported by many external evidences which you can see on the statistics and databases. as i posted above, you can contact them whenever you want if you have a question about information. each topic and movie on the web page, the author provide its data and source of it.
other websites link to this page, for example, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. the site approximately support the ILO. the site added sights of Japan about labor.
an example of website about child labor which is not good. i think this site should be revise. the most important thing is to add source of knowledge.
site: Child Labor
http://www.angelfire.com/ky/LaborUnions/ChildLabor.html
there are no information about author, so i we cant understand carrier and background. on this website, there are only information about history of child labor which we cannot know source of knowledge. therefore, it can be said that this is unreliable site. maybe we cannot contact to author of this site because there are no description about contact such as e-mail address and so on.
in addition, miss spelling was occurred. for example, no pauper to nonpauper.
site: International Lobor Organization
http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm
the ILO has 900 work in technical cooperation programmes and projects. the ILO is a specialized agency of United Nations, and the director is Guy Ryder. Guy Ryder studied Social and Political Sciences at the University of Cambridge and Latin American Studies at the University of Liverpool. He started his professional career in 1981 as assistant at the International Department of the Trade Union Congress in London. in other field, he was elected as first General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC).
this site is sponsoring author's page. ILO is devoted to promoting social justice and internationally recognized human and labour rights, pursuing its founding mission that labour peace is essential to prosperity. if we contact to this organization, we should send them an e-mail at info@ilo.org
the ILO present over-simplified perspective on child labor, and appeal reasonably with no extreme or exaggerated languages.
many links to other websites are found, and these links work normally and support author's claim.
the date of publication can be found, and the latest topic was added on 13 June 2013. it shows that it is a reliable information.
facts on this page is correct because author conclude from much information and data from official examination. there are no spelling error, and we can verified that the information is true from the URL of the reference.
also, opinions on the web page is supported by many external evidences which you can see on the statistics and databases. as i posted above, you can contact them whenever you want if you have a question about information. each topic and movie on the web page, the author provide its data and source of it.
other websites link to this page, for example, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. the site approximately support the ILO. the site added sights of Japan about labor.
an example of website about child labor which is not good. i think this site should be revise. the most important thing is to add source of knowledge.
site: Child Labor
http://www.angelfire.com/ky/LaborUnions/ChildLabor.html
there are no information about author, so i we cant understand carrier and background. on this website, there are only information about history of child labor which we cannot know source of knowledge. therefore, it can be said that this is unreliable site. maybe we cannot contact to author of this site because there are no description about contact such as e-mail address and so on.
in addition, miss spelling was occurred. for example, no pauper to nonpauper.
2013年6月7日金曜日
Various opinions to child labor
There are some people who agree with child labor. They say that they agree with it on some accounts. They are saying that for these reasons. First, it is ok in the case that it is safe, there is no abuse, and it is for a good purpose. Second, child labor is fine as long as the children haven't developed phisical problems, still get reasonable educations, have a clean work environment, and the employer is not abusive. Third, it is not a problem if children aren't forced to do the work and have free time. More than anything else, child labor is acceptable if the children themselves enjoy their works as the labor.
However, even if there is no condition like those any more, it is not possible to avoid a problem like child labor in the third world countries because there, they work just to survive. if they stop working, then not only the child but also his family will be affected. So in those countries, it is not easy problem for them to be against the idea of child labor. For example, child labor in Bangladish cannot be stopped. This is due to the lack of financial aid. And also, their parents don't even have the capabilities to buy food and clothes, or give primary educations to their child. Child labor is necessary, otherwise, how are they going to survive?
On the other hand, there is a person who say that whether we are for or against child labor, depends on our definitions of child labor. If it is simple chores, then I believe youngsters should undergo such training for their adulthood. However, if you are talking about miners and phisical labors, then I strongly disagree. Not only does that limit the for the kids to become historical figures, it also changes their mind and psychology. For example, they will see adults as "rapists, psychopaths, abusing and unfair". You see, people who are greedy and prefer prohit than people's lives, will choose children and female workers than males. Why? It is clear. The female and children are easier to control and to force to do phisical labor. Also, it is hard for them to enforce bigger wages. Overall, child labor is another definition of "stupidity".
I honestly think that children should really get the opportunity to live and have a childhood. I don't believe that children should work at a young age. They should concentrate on school works and school-related activities so that they can form their individual behaviors and identities before deciding on who they are and what they want to do with their lives. So I disagree.
However, even if there is no condition like those any more, it is not possible to avoid a problem like child labor in the third world countries because there, they work just to survive. if they stop working, then not only the child but also his family will be affected. So in those countries, it is not easy problem for them to be against the idea of child labor. For example, child labor in Bangladish cannot be stopped. This is due to the lack of financial aid. And also, their parents don't even have the capabilities to buy food and clothes, or give primary educations to their child. Child labor is necessary, otherwise, how are they going to survive?
On the other hand, there is a person who say that whether we are for or against child labor, depends on our definitions of child labor. If it is simple chores, then I believe youngsters should undergo such training for their adulthood. However, if you are talking about miners and phisical labors, then I strongly disagree. Not only does that limit the for the kids to become historical figures, it also changes their mind and psychology. For example, they will see adults as "rapists, psychopaths, abusing and unfair". You see, people who are greedy and prefer prohit than people's lives, will choose children and female workers than males. Why? It is clear. The female and children are easier to control and to force to do phisical labor. Also, it is hard for them to enforce bigger wages. Overall, child labor is another definition of "stupidity".
I honestly think that children should really get the opportunity to live and have a childhood. I don't believe that children should work at a young age. They should concentrate on school works and school-related activities so that they can form their individual behaviors and identities before deciding on who they are and what they want to do with their lives. So I disagree.
Two different perspectives
I'll introduce different perspectives here.
First, I found a opinion of Zarah Jamal and Ismael Rhissa. This opinion is that people who dont agree with child labor, but we shouldn't ban it. They partly disagree with child labor, but dont agree with ban it.
Zarah Jamal is an enterprise-risk consultant. She was born in Montreal of Pakistani immigrants. From now on, i'll introduce her opinion.
Child labor should be protected, not banned. It's easy to say that children should be in school and educated, but some if we banned labor itself, other serious problems will be occurred. For example, theft, drag trafficking and hunger. It is because children and thier family managed to live with little money children have gained that day especially in India, Pakistan, Niger, Cambodia or any number of other Third World countries. If there are no wages of children, it create danger to death because of no money.
The instinctive reaction is to support an end to child labour, but on a deeper level we need to ask ourselves whether a ban merely opens the door to other unintended consequences. People who easily says that we have to eliminate child labor don't understand actual situation of children. What we have to do is just helping them learn English. for example, we open up many more opportunities for them as they grow up. To create such oppotunities lead to the next stage for the country and children themselves.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/touch/story.html?id=8377695
Secondly, i'll introduce opinion that is completely disagree against child labor. I'll introduce opinion of Dave Neil, who is the Iowa Labor Commissioner, from an article of NY times. Iowa is a kind of state which was found numbers of child labor.
State labor invetigators have identified 57under-age workers who were employed at a kosher meatpacking plant, and have asked the attorney to bring criminal charges against the company. Since we found these kinds of issue at present, we have to clamp down child labor by law. Children worked at the plant included children who made work in prohibited occupations, exposing them to hazardous chemicals and making prohibited tools like knives or saws.
Maybe more children are working over our expectation, because most chidren were hired by a false documents. I urged Tom Miller, who is the Iowa attorney general to prosecure to the full extent of the law.
I think Iowa law requires employers to make an extra effort to determine the date of birth of workers who could be minors, including asking for a birth certificate or other official proof of age. That is a tip for elimination of child labor.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06meat.html?ref=childlabor&pagewanted
First, I found a opinion of Zarah Jamal and Ismael Rhissa. This opinion is that people who dont agree with child labor, but we shouldn't ban it. They partly disagree with child labor, but dont agree with ban it.
Zarah Jamal is an enterprise-risk consultant. She was born in Montreal of Pakistani immigrants. From now on, i'll introduce her opinion.
Child labor should be protected, not banned. It's easy to say that children should be in school and educated, but some if we banned labor itself, other serious problems will be occurred. For example, theft, drag trafficking and hunger. It is because children and thier family managed to live with little money children have gained that day especially in India, Pakistan, Niger, Cambodia or any number of other Third World countries. If there are no wages of children, it create danger to death because of no money.
The instinctive reaction is to support an end to child labour, but on a deeper level we need to ask ourselves whether a ban merely opens the door to other unintended consequences. People who easily says that we have to eliminate child labor don't understand actual situation of children. What we have to do is just helping them learn English. for example, we open up many more opportunities for them as they grow up. To create such oppotunities lead to the next stage for the country and children themselves.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/touch/story.html?id=8377695
Secondly, i'll introduce opinion that is completely disagree against child labor. I'll introduce opinion of Dave Neil, who is the Iowa Labor Commissioner, from an article of NY times. Iowa is a kind of state which was found numbers of child labor.
State labor invetigators have identified 57under-age workers who were employed at a kosher meatpacking plant, and have asked the attorney to bring criminal charges against the company. Since we found these kinds of issue at present, we have to clamp down child labor by law. Children worked at the plant included children who made work in prohibited occupations, exposing them to hazardous chemicals and making prohibited tools like knives or saws.
Maybe more children are working over our expectation, because most chidren were hired by a false documents. I urged Tom Miller, who is the Iowa attorney general to prosecure to the full extent of the law.
I think Iowa law requires employers to make an extra effort to determine the date of birth of workers who could be minors, including asking for a birth certificate or other official proof of age. That is a tip for elimination of child labor.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06meat.html?ref=childlabor&pagewanted
2013年6月2日日曜日
Others opinion
I'll introduce other opinions here.
Opposite sides
･I agree with her idea of excluding child labor because all the children in the world who work unwillingly or not have the right to learn a lot of things, such as the importance of achieving something with friends and how to act in public in schools.
･ I totally agree with the opinion that developed countries should make effort to change the situation of child labour in developing countries as the first step.
･ I agree with your idea that children should not work because it is unhealthy for them.Because children are flexible, so they should study and acquire a lot of skills.
As you can understand from above, i found that people tend to have contrary opinions about this topic.
登録:
コメント (Atom)